/anok/ - AnokChan

a society of dandys
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Verification
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1417226223834.gif (993.37 KB, 245x200, territory.gif)

No.2647[Reply]

So territory claims against the state of a political territory can be difficult. Bioregionalism is suggested by some, but since the boundaries of such territories are quite large, making this a tangible success would be difficult. A territory seizure today requires the very people that occupy the territory at the moment of attempt. The indigenous genocide was successful in most areas of the United States and rallying a band of indigenous together would only result in the seizure of territory that a small size of people could take. In many areas, maybe reservations could assert more autonomy, but taking land occupied by colonialists would be severely limited.

Black populations, however, could take many large urban areas, sometimes entire cities and large parts of many states. Hispanics have a much greater chance than blacks with more potential sympathizers as well as historic ties to Spanish colonialism and Western U.S. indigenous.

Whites also have a chance in many regions. Non-dominant whites, like Appalachian whites and Southern whites, have strong independent and dissident ties. With the rise of Western liberalism and leftism, this colonial independence has been discredited as white supremacist. It is taboo to discuss the Civil War as the end of the liberal revolutionary movement, the hypocrisy of wage slavery, the rise of the central government and the birth of Jacobin styled autocracy. Given the hostile takeover of industry of the United States over the Confederate, wage slavery was an inevitability that Russia was also engaging in.

The terms of the American left is weighed against the Confederate and the hillbilly. They are two dimensional because they held to values rejected by the left. New values (anti-racism, chattel slavery abolition) became a given to be socially accepted, while normalizing industrialism and work as a necessity.

It is also democracy that moved people. The end to de jure aristocracy. The franchise was thought to be the path of progress. The battle for democracy only got so far before struggle became legal instead of democratic. Unions defined by mechanisms for mass society.

The white colonial rebel is for Confederacy and independent states. But they are also for Western essentialism. Canada, Australia, New Zealand and other British colonies often fly the Confederate battle flag in white neighborhoods to signify that it is the white people that conquered this land and they intend to sPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
3 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

No.2671

>>2667

that nigga's stylish and cute as fuck

i'd fuck him, can't say you wouldn't fuck him. fuck him right in his boypussy

No.2677

>>2665
New rule is third position is ass-to-mouth.

Not a fan of the third position. But free will is free will. All such groups are merely cultural essentialists, to hold the premise that ATM is an inherent part of who we are. Yet social reality is compromise. Pro-mass and pro-democratic groups may prove to be the greater threat following the institutions themselves. These people will reproduce mass institutions while the democratic people would formalize and universalize the collective organs of an area. Bookchin versus Hakim Hey = libertarian municipalism versus immediatism (Autonomous Zone theory).

The third position saw in immediatism the ability to make groups that defend but values. For Sea Weed, these values enable tradition and liberation, indigenous and pro-habitat zones but for the third position a defense of colonial values as a choice. To me, the third position should not be treated like the fascists of the 20th century. Rather they should be challenged like Marxists. They may be racists that borrow immediatist organizing theory, but they are but one group that enjoy ass-to-mouth. Not only Nazis and quasi-fascists, but racist liberals, conservatives, religious fundamentalists and so on.

Racism is also common among the lower non-political classes. Once we weigh all of society it becomes apparent to me that the third position has enough common ground to disagree but work together in contexts where statism is weakening but the population loves ass-to-mouth too much to challenge essentialist taboos. I imagine the opposite being more frequent. Anarchist immediatists working with social ecologists to force Western enlightenment values in various territories. Given the collution of anarchists with the left, there seems to be a feeling that anarchists and leftists share community, even among most anarchist individualists. Anarchists are more likely to allow institutional structure in before attempting to get along with lovers of ass-to-mouth.

But what of the third position? Aren't they justifying a territory seizure that would force out anyone that doesn't like a little ATM? Ah, this is where things are tricky. An ATM demagogue would insist this is the case, but the actual theory is also built on compromise of will to build the community that is to take the zone. When a community goes gray on enlightenment, egoist or essentialist viewPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

No.2678

File: 1417968853460.gif (22.41 KB, 620x397, 529e5eda166e3.preview-620.gif)

>>2671
We should totally do pyramids with that boy in the middle. He has a perdy mouth. High five!

No.2679

File: 1417972617779.png (40.14 KB, 583x311, Screenshot - 12072014 - 11:16:…)

>>2677
>wat

>>2670
I'm glad you like my idea but I… don't really feel like writing an actual essay about it. Because I am lazy. And I hate writing.

Captcha: SUCHEVIL
omg yes

No.2683

>>2679
I'm going to make an animated cartoon that illustrates how whiteness is the colonization of European descendants.



File: 1416083307309.jpg (869.66 KB, 1868x3084, Komuso_Buddhist_monk_beggar_Ki…)

No.2563[Reply]

what is your favourite music band?
3 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

No.2569

File: 1416157333860.jpg (100.01 KB, 430x240, 430x240.jpg)

Right now? ROME.

No.2570

joy division, penguin cafe orchestra, mogwai, gybe

but then again i have been listening to synth music almost exclusively the las three weeks or so

No.2585

spoek mathambo &/or fantasma

No.2589


No.2681

File: 1417979028609.jpg (138.31 KB, 365x280, paresse.jpg)




File: 1417972863445.jpg (181.62 KB, 1024x768, wp083.jpg)

No.2680[Reply]

we have just started a new non-profit anime video site to benefit childhood cancer research:

http://www.anamaze.com/

Enjoy!

No.2682

File: 1417979179205.jpg (100.85 KB, 800x600, Newspaper_boxes_removed_from_t…)




File: 1417923125966.png (89.1 KB, 415x250, Star_Wars_Rebels_logo.png)

No.2675[Reply]

I would make total destroy the Empire

No.2676

nerd



File: 1417889413452.jpg (10.74 KB, 259x194, 4.jpg)

No.2673[Reply]

No.2674

File: 1417891465202.jpg (87.34 KB, 512x768, 2011_newspaper_boxes_Washingto…)

I can't fap to this



File: 1417555583128.png (35.41 KB, 707x563, library torrent ratio.png)

No.2661[Reply]

What's your ratio?

No.2662

Dang, had it on my seedbox a few iterations ago and had uploaded 112 gigs over the year I had it up there. Maybe I oughta put it back on this other one I have.

No.2663

>>2662
Seeding any other rebellious torrents??

No.2669

>>2663
Not really. Mostly bad tv and movies. Link me and and I shall make them available.



File: 1416239431779.jpg (245.7 KB, 768x1024, IMG_1414794982811.jpg)

No.2572[Reply]

Satan, the adversary. To Yahweh and his followers, this being is often interpreted as Lucifer. The role of Lucifer in enlightening humanity while at the same time "sinning" for the first time. To sin is to act against Yahweh, the demiurge. So to seek enlightenment is to sin, to act against the deity that claims dominion over the world and claims its creation as well as many other powers such as omniscience and omnipotence.

The right to judge other beings and control the direction of life after death is also claimed by Yahweh. So many roles this deity claims that Yahweh's logic is synominous with autocracy. A hand in everything, chaos has no home in his perfect order. Yet we are surrounded by chaos! The 10 commandments were a line in the sand, yet you can still act against the "almighty", the "lord", the "king of kings". Homosexuals are hated according to some passages, but the context confuses the 10 commandments. It was just those fuckers who were trying to fuck those angels that were blamed for acting against Yahweh, not all faggots.

But those that know better learn that this deity is but one deity among many and they may also learn that deities are symbols for attributes people find appealing. People make up stories or use existing ones to make sense in their life for who they are and how they want to relate.

For Luciferians there is actually a strong connection to Western values. Same with anarchists, egoists and nihilists. All act against Yahweh at times, but none claim a strong Satanic or anti-Christian theme, but all do embrace the trappings of moral rebel, all claim some level of heresy outside of those anarchists that cling to the tit of Christianity or religion in general. But they all have differences.

The difference I want to talk about with Lucifer is the essential symbolic tying of Lucifer to enlightenment. If one is looking for a deity against civilization, Lucifer may not serve this purpose. Those with occult knowledge often turn to Lucifer, the light bringer. But those very same people see Lucifer as a call to take advantage of this society in order to seek enlightenment. This enlightenment is very similar to Nietzsche's overman or Crowley's true will. So become materially comfortable then seek self-deification. This is not Satanic nor anti-Christian. This is not anarchist or nihilist. As far as egoisms go, this path is not a challenge to the order that prevents the exercise of desire, it instead makes Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
7 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

No.2622

File: 1416856592568.jpeg (8.6 KB, 160x207, th.jpeg)

>>2600

Eris, of course!!!

No.2627

File: 1416932998276.jpg (63.17 KB, 722x828, the_real_revolution_by_pappaja…)

So to bring together some of the points raised in this and several related topics:

Bands are a desired result of social formation. Without time tested longevity, without an animal relationship with the land, those anti-mass social formations may be better referred to as a "collective" or more specifically an anti-mass collective. Collectives have potential to be bands, but they have just as much potential to be a business, an activist group, a mass organizing group and so on. For this reason, a critical approach to living may be desired. Networking with other collectives that are all attempting to define themselves as anti-mass and direct action oriented can help with the experiment.

In an anti-mass approach, living an anti-mass lifestyle is part of the rebellion against mass society. However in direction, boycotting mass society is not the intention. Have a collective/direct action orientation which maximizes the power of the individual through a collective relationship is. This includes the legitimacy of violence, but also the removal of legitimacy from the institutions of mass society which make up or defend the state of the territory in question. In order to make an effective claim of autonomy is to create local networks of subsistence which exist as a shadow economy for anti-mass/direct action collectives.

This may seem like a counter power situation and while that is debatable, the counter power of collectivism was interpreted in a mass society relationship, where the outcome became the furtherance of business, often with a friendly relationship or association with unions and other civil society institutions.

This differs in intention. If collectives engage in commodity exchanges, the profits would be used to solidify the collective's anti-mass/direct action capabilities, its multi-generational growth, its reduction of the division of labor, its ability to subsist without the luxuries of mass society, its reciprocal internal culture. The Amish come to mind as an comparative example, though I'm certain their may be much to criticize about them, Amish living gives a tangible vision for an anarchist attempt. But so do the Almighty Gaylords, both imperfect examples to see the flexibility of this praxis.

For the indigenous, this approach may seem redundant. Mass society is often the culture of the occupier. But then again without a critique of mass society (or despite it) many indigenous have accepted it into tPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

No.2656

>For Luciferians there is actually a strong connection to Western values. Same with anarchists, egoists and nihilists. All act against Yahweh at times, but none claim a strong Satanic or anti-Christian theme, but all do embrace the trappings of moral rebel, all claim some level of heresy outside of those anarchists that cling to the tit of Christianity or religion in general. But they all have differences.

The "Evil One" is not at all anti-christian, even if in the christian stories it acts against yahwey. Christianity developed the thought of an "evil" and of the Evil One himself. Satan is pure christianity.

Rebellion is moralist in that it is something done in defense, something done as a christian

No.2659

Discussion is spiritually relevant, though as demonstrated in >>2593 and >>2594, and with the example of the Catholic Church's history as a nearly satanic organization, you can't really draw Satan or satanism on one side of another. Sometimes it amounts to supporting the most vicious, violent, murderous fascist regimes, sometimes it's destabilizing civilization for nature to take back what was taken (the Pan way).

I think that without falling into the neopagan bandwagon, it's interesting to also look at the non-christian mythologies.

No.2668

Sir, do you even esoteric doctrine?

Lucifer is Kether, the Lightbringer; the Small Point and the first individuated manifestation of Ain Soph Aur, or, the Limitless Light.

Satan is Malkuth, Lord of Karma and Materialism, the last manifestation of Ain Soph Aur. This is why, in the exoteric myths, he is the one who lures humans into material sin, and punishes them.

Lucifer's 'fall' and subsequent rebranding as Satan is nothing more than a coded myth describing the descent of pure energy to dense matter.



File: 1417177583026.jpg (54.54 KB, 624x351, Anarchists arson Bristol.jpg)

No.2641[Reply]

Yuppies and security company employees have been burning their cars and blaming "anarchists" to file insurance claims.
1 post and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

No.2651

banks pay people to smash their windows during marches to hike up insurance rates and rents for that neighborhood. it aint new.

No.2653

>>2651
got it. property damage is bad, actually.

No.2658

>>2653
Property is bad, actually.

No.2660

File: 1417468528671.jpg (116.49 KB, 500x392, RFtIoAq.jpg)

>>2658
physical world is bad, actually.

No.2666

File: 1417739609048.png (34.65 KB, 565x380, Screenshot - 12042014 - 06:33:…)

>>2660
gg allin is bad, actually.

l my vote



File: 1417602944321.jpg (28.78 KB, 390x590, kg.jpg)

No.2664[Reply]

No.2672

File: 1417833591142.jpg (264.21 KB, 1024x768, 2006_newspaper_boxes_Boston_Ma…)




File: 1416090369840.jpg (123.26 KB, 800x804, chronicsick_cutest_01front.jpg)

No.2564[Reply]

If a nation had no state, would it be a tribe, and if so, would that be anarchy?
11 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

No.2643

>>2636
Thanks, looks like superb reading

No.2649

>>2643

thanx i enjoyed those two quite a bit

also i found some more goodies

Siouan Sociology
A Posthumous Paper By James Owen Dorsey
http://omahatribe.unl.edu/etexts/oma.0004/oma.0004.html

which is posibly an overly detailed examination of one example of tribal sociology

and

LEOPOLD KOHR (1978): The Breakdown of Nations, E.P. Dutton, New
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

No.2654

>>2649
>you can only have real democracy in very small states
Unfortunately, a small state is still a state.

No.2655

>>2654

well democracy as popularly defined isn't really the goal of anarchism anyway.

the point is that there are natural diseconomies of scale involved in building human communities. and above a certain level a community cannot manage itself very effectively be it anarchist or otherwise.

No.2657

>>2654
but it is not as hard to leave that state as when the state is enormous. i hate global unification of law. i hate european union



Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]